2 women earn Chemistry Nobel Prize for gene-editing tool CRISPR



The 2020 Nobel Prize in chemistry went to two women who developed a gene-editing tool called CRISPR-Cas9, which snips DNA like a pair of molecular scissors. 



a close up of a flower: illustration of crispr-cas9 snipping a bit of DNA from a strand


© Provided by Live Science
illustration of crispr-cas9 snipping a bit of DNA from a strand

The technique “has not only revolutionized basic science, but also resulted in innovative crops and will lead to ground-breaking new medical treatments,” Claes Gustafsson, chair of the Nobel Committee for Chemistry, said in a statement. With the ability to deftly slice specific DNA sequences from the genome, scientists can pinpoint the functions of genes; these discoveries both add to our basic understanding of how those genes work and can have practical applications, such as for growing drought- and pest-resistant crops and developing therapies for cancer and genetic disorders. The genetic cut-and-paste system is also being used in new COVID-19 diagnostic tests.

The Nobel “for the development of a method for genome editing” went to Emmanuelle Charpentier, director of the Max Planck Unit for the Science of Pathogens, and Jennifer Doudna, a professor of biochemistry, biophysics and structural biology of the University of California, Berkeley. This is the first science Nobel to be awarded to an all-female team, according to Science Magazine. 

Related: Nobel Prize in Chemistry: 1901-Present 

The development of CRISPR-Cas9 began serendipitously when Charpentier was studying the bacteria Streptococcus pyogenes, which causes a range of diseases from tonsillitis to sepsis, according to a statement from the Nobel Committee. The bacteria contain a molecule called tracrRNA, Charpentier discovered, which protects S. pyogenes against infection by viruses, according to a 2011 report in the journal Nature. 

It turned out that tracrRNA was just one component in a larger defense mechanism known as the CRISPR/Cas system, which bacteria use to slice and dice the DNA of viruses that try to infect them, Live Science previously reported. After a viral attack, the bacteria incorporate a piece of viral DNA into their own genome; these battle trophies line up in the genome, appearing repeatedly, and are known as “clusters of regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats,” abbreviated as CRISPR. These archived genes are thought to help bacteria recognize the viruses and ward off future attacks.  

But to first slice up the viral DNA, bacteria use “CRISPR-associated” proteins, called Cas proteins, under the guidance of tracrRNA and other molecules.

After her discovery of tracrRNA, Charpentier began collaborating with Doudna, and the two recreated the bacteria’s genetic scissors in a test tube. In their seminal work, published in 2012 in the journal Science, they simplified the system into a handy gene-editing tool, capable of targeting and snipping specific DNA sequences from the genome. The tool has since been further refined and used for a wide range of applications, including the recent development of diagnostic tests for COVID-19, BBC reported.

“This discovery, originally derived from a natural defense mechanism in bacteria against viruses, will have untold applications in treating and curing genetic diseases and fighting cancer, as well as impacts on agricultural and other areas,” Luis Echegoyen, president of the American Chemical Society, said in a statement. “The future for this technique is indeed bright and promising.” 

Some scientists expected that biochemist Feng Zhang of the Broad Institute might share the Nobel with Charpentier and Doudna, as shortly after their discovery, he demonstrated that CRISPR also works in mammalian cells, Science Magazine reported. Based on Zhang’s work, the Broad Institute received the first patent for the use of CRISPR gene-editing technology in eukaryotes — complex cells with nuclei to hold their DNA — but Charpentier’s and Doudna’s institutions continue to fight for their own patents, according to The Scientist Magazine. 

Originally published on Live Science.

Source Article